November 23, 2010

China's recent towering inferno does NOT collapse!



The public has been told repeatedly that on 9/11, two skyscrapers (actually three!) were destroyed due to office fires which weakened the structures' steel.

With that in mind, a recent news story tells of a large building fire in Shanghai which unfortunately killed at least 40 people and injured dozens more at a block of flats. The apartment complex was under renovation, the fire spread to many of the 28 floors, and it took about 6 hours to get the fire under control. And yet... the building did not collapse!! This is very normal, as NO steel framed high-rise building in history has collapsed [due to fire], before or after 9/11. Not ever.


I urge you to read more about this and other serious, unanswered 9/11 questions at ae911truth.org.

(source)

Also, see this:



follow-up: http://www.hotelchatter.com/story/2009/2/19/164212/118/hotels/mandarin_Oriental_Beijing_After_the_Fire

2 comments:

  1. Utter insanity - who says the construction of the two buildings is even remotely comparable?

    ReplyDelete
  2. "Who says the construction of the two buildings is even remotely comparable?" This doesn't even make sense at all. Which "two" buildings are you even comparing? WTC 1, 2, or 7?

    But are you suggesting that a Chinese apartment building -- under renovation -- is more resistant to fire damage than WTC 1, 2, and 7?

    Besides, you also missed the part where I mentioned "NO steel framed high-rise building in history has collapsed [due to fire], before or after 9/11, ever." So, you seriously think that each one of those buildings (most of which burned far longer and hotter) was stronger than the award-winning WTC 1, 2, and 7?

    Now... I ask you to look into this topic some more, with an open mind and critical thinking skills in tact.

    ReplyDelete