Pay close attention to the words used in this article about Osama bin Laden:
|Osama's FBI Indictment|
Indictment: He's wanted in connection with bombings of U.S. embassies in which hundreds of people were killed, as well as terrorist attacks throughout the world.
Notice anything odd? Osama's indictment by the FBI mentions nothing specific about 9/11. Strange? Yes, but it's true! Check out his FBI Most Wanted page and see for yourself -- nothing mentioned about 9/11, the greatest terrorist event in our life!!
So here's the bottom line: If the FBI doesn't have evidence that Osama bin Laden caused 9/11, then why should you or I believe that he did do it?? It is not logical to believe that Osama bin Laden is guilty of the crime of 9/11; otherwise the FBI would have listed that proven fact on his WANTED poster.
But it's not there. (There is more evidence to support this conclusion about Osama and 9/11, but the former point is 100% incontrovertible.)
So who did do it? That's the critical question that needs a new investigation to find the answer. (The first investigation simply assumed it was Osama without any question!)